Skip to main content

Arch Linux: a Ubuntu user's perspective

Installation

    Installing +Arch Linux was honestly a little more work than I was expecting.  I for some reason was under the impression that Arch LInux was a works out of the box sort of distro.  I was sorely mistaken, installing Arch was a lot more like fighting balrogs; trying to get Gentoo working.  Not the simple insert cd come back in 25 minutes and your done kind of install that I am accustomed to with +Ubuntu.

    I had to try and try again to get grub2 to actually work, mostly because I wasn't very good at following directions... Though in my defense I believe that the installation guide for Arch could use a little clarifying.

    I was somewhat suprised that after initial install Arch Linux has no network up by default.  So after getting that worked out it was just a matter of installing the correct drivers for my wireless card, which I have to do in Ubuntu actually though the process much simpler, still not to big of a hassel.

    After installing the desktop environment of my choice (xfce) and a desktop manager (gdm) I was a little suprised again that installing Xfce did not also install Xorg...  I mean you would think that if you can't use Xfce without Xorg it would be a dependancy and the package manager would handle that for you..  oh well...  After all this installing packages has been fairly straightforward and pacman seems to be a pretty decent package manager causing only minimal headaches.

  The "Rolling Upgrade"

     The one thing I do like about Arch that is missing from most other operating systems is this idea of the rolling upgrade. On Arch you are always just a 'pacman -Syu' away from the latest and greatest the open source software community has to offer. No need to worrry about upgrading to the latest release because you are always on the latest release.

  Final Thoughts

     Arch Linux is definately not for beginners, mostly just because of the relatively complex installation process and occasionally upgrading the system would break something like wireless.  All and all I'd say I am happy with Arch Linux, though I am not willing to give up my first GNU/Linux love.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Redistricting Oregon.

 Earlier last month Oregon Secretary of State Dennis Richardson announced his plans for a constructional amendment to place the task of redistricting into the hands of an independent commission.  Currently Oregon is one of the many states in which redistricting is handled by the legislature themselves.  Democrats in the state were quick to reject the plan as a Republican power grab, an attempt to gerrymander the state.    In 2011 something that hadn't happened for several decades occurred in Oregon.  The legislature was able to pass a redistricting plan without challenge from the Supreme Court or the Governor.  This is especially surprising because the House of Representatives at the time was evenly split between Democrats and Republicans.  The redistricting bill passed with a wide margin.  You could say that the redistricting plan of 2011 was bipartisan, but were districts still gerrymandered? Gerrymandering in Oregon? ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why I'm running for the parks board

  Two months ago now I declared my candidacy for election to Northern Wasco County Parks and Recreation District Board of Directors Position Number Five.  A mouth full of a title.  I really enjoy our local parks and have no major qualms with the parks district or the current board.  They have done a fine job maintaining and improving existing parks and programs.  So there's question you are probably asking and I am required to ask myself.  Why am I running? Democracy requires contest   What is the point of an election with only one candidate?  Without contested races there is almost no need for real public discourse unless some controversy springs up.  This is all too common for local elections in Wasco County.  Uncontested races are akin to a business handing a job to the first and only applicant.  This wouldn't work in the private sector and it shouldn't work for public offices.   Surely the citi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Book report: A People's History of the United States

A People's History of the United States by Howard Zinn is probably one of the most cynical takes on American history ever written.  It is blatantly and openly biased, intentionally seeking to tell the stories that the author feels aren't told through the traditional narrative of US history.  Despite being openly antagonistic A People's History is full of citations from first hand and second hand sources as well as quotes from other published history texts.  In other words it takes many of the bleakest points in American History (chattel slavery, native genocide, worker suppression) and does a great job proving that, yes, things really were "as bad as all that."   On the whole I'm happy to read a starkly different telling of US history, especially in relation to our foreign policy.  Zinn leaves little doubt around the imperialistic ambitions of many of the United States military conflicts (especially the  Mexican American and Vietnam Wars).  He i...
Post a Comment
Read more